What mechanism does protective democracy include to hold governors accountable?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for UCF POT4314 Contemporary Democratic Theory Exam. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions with explanations. Pass your exam with confidence!

The mechanism of protective democracy that includes a way to hold governors accountable is through the secret ballot and regular voting. This approach ensures that citizens can choose their representatives in a manner that is both private and consistent, allowing for genuine expression of their political preferences without the fear of coercion or repercussions.

The use of secret ballots is particularly important in maintaining the integrity of elections and ensuring that voters can make decisions based on their beliefs rather than external pressures. Regular voting provides a periodic opportunity for the electorate to assess the performance of their elected officials and make decisions about whether to retain or replace them. Together, these practices form a foundation for accountability in governance, as they empower citizens to exercise their democratic rights effectively.

In contrast, other options such as public referendums, judicial reviews, and enhanced media scrutiny, while relevant to democratic processes, do not primarily serve as direct mechanisms for holding elected officials accountable in the same systematic way that regular elections and secret voting do. These alternatives may play supportive roles within a broader democratic framework but do not focus specifically on the accountability aspect inherent in regular electoral processes.